Monday, February 25, 2019
Blood Doping: Is it Rational and Ethical? Essay
Youre in the big range and your play off who youve been neck and neck with all year long somehow defeat you by way more than usual. You ran wholeness of the best hightail its of your life and he somehow beat you and you dont make love how. Winning that race would defend gotten a lot of opportunities from big colleges and instead of looking at you theyre looking instead, at your rival. How would you feel if you later learned the intellect he was able to beat you was only beca determination he started kindred doping? straightaway imagine this happening at the professional level every day. declination doping is unethical, un seemly, unsafe, and needs to be regulated and removed wholly from professional fluctuations and unskilled social occasion. railway line doping is comparable to the administration of anabolic steroids and other medicates with the hope of meliorate athletic performance. Anabolic steroids convey been considered unethical and take hold been banned fr om use in sports and blood doping, as it should, is banned as well. The athletes are placing themselves at risk for serious complications without medical benefit. Surely there is the idea that they get out do anything to win, tho is it worth it? Kathleen Sharp, in her article A dose to Quicken the Blood, shares the negatives to EPO explaining, Too many red blood cells can mature your blood to sludge and make the heart work everywheretime. The drug brocaded the risks of strokes, blood clots, and heart attacks. Even worse was that EPO could potentially multiply pubic louse cells (Sharp).Look moresatiric essaysEPO has so many wellness risks and these athletes comely ignore them because their goals are more focused on winning preferably than their long-term health. There are many other athletes out there, who wipe outnt admitted to it, precisely are taking EPO without the publics experience and some of the reason might be that they are taking it only if to persist in up w ith others. Imagine this scenario One athlete starts doping and starts excelling above others, consequently other athletes impart need to dope as well to keep pace with him. The fact that there can only be one winner means a lot of these athletes are doping and are not winning anything, which results in risking and damaging their health without having anything to show for it.Besides the health line of works that EPO risks, users are making a conscious decision to use an irregular substance to attempt to benefit their performance and gain an edge on the competition. Much equal steroids as mentioned before, EPO is not allowed to be used in sports. Using an illegal substance to try to gain an edge over the competition is unethical no matter what position you take on blood doping. If blood doping was allowed in sports, then the discussion would be different, but since it is not, using it is considered cheating which is unethical behavior and is not acceptable in competition of any kind.Theres a code of ethical motive that athletes are sibyllic to follow. They sign contracts and get paid millions of dollars to perform in their respective sport and its assumed they got to where they are because of their own talents, backbreaking work, and without the aid of illegal performance enhancing drugs. I think its fair to make a general assumption that we expect professionals who are supposed to be the best at what they do to be able to do what they do without cheating.One article from Mens Fitness shows a study done by Dutch researchers that looks at how much motivate blood doping really has on elite group athletes. Shawn Radcliffe, the author of Study EPO Blood Doping Useless for Elite Athletes, explains how the study and found that, in spite of pop belief, theres little evidence to show EPO can modify performance in cyclists, who are considered to be elite athletes. He describes how elite athletes already require such maximal oxygen uptake, that EPO will have l ittle change in the transportation of oxygen and therefore have little effect on performance.So its very potential that Lance Armstrong may have lost his career and titles for nothing if he already had the highest VO2max, or maximal oxygen intake, levels he could which means EPO would have been doing nothing for him. If he and other cyclists raced without the use of EPO, it would make the sport fairer, and there would be no question of his integrity and no doubt in everyones minds that he is the grea canvass cyclist in the world. But since we know he used EPO, he lost everything and it all could have been avoided if the drug wasnt used in the first place. Even if it was, there should have been tests done to prevent those who were blood doping from being able to race.My solution to the problem of blood doping is to have professional doctors hired by the sports federation (not the one-on-one teams doctor) go to each team and test each athlete by the piece for steroid and EPO use. Es pecially for major events that are world renowned and watched like the Olympics, World Cup, Tour de France, and the Super bowl, all athletes in these events should be blood tested for steroids and EPO use.There should be no excuse not to since these athletes have a responsibility to be honest and clean for the check of the sport and to be fair to all athletes out there, especially to those who dont use drugs. Make athletes afraid to dope and hopefully the fad will be eradicated soon enough. If sports can ban, test for, and regulate steroid use then I believe they should reasonably and feasibly be able to test athletes for EPO use as well.Now going back to that big race, but this time without any blood doping involved you run the best race of your life and beat that rival youve been neck and neck with all year long. All those big colleges youve been looking at are now scout you and all the opportunities are opening up. With all things fair, its those who train harder and better tha t deserve to win, not those who cheat and use performance enhancing drugs to do it. Thats why blood doping needs to be regulated and removed completely from professional sports and recreational use.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.